The Misprojection of Projection: CODA.

The fact remains that, if an action is *intrinsically* contemptible or vile, then it will be recognized as such by anyone with clear discernment. Those who will be most disgusted are not those most guilty but the ones most innocent. The Jungians suggested that this was because the innocent suppress their own repugnant tendencies. Yet even those who have become aware of such repugnant tendencies will feel disgust in seeing them incarnate in the flesh, for those will be the ones best armed not only to perceive them but to fight them.

No: the Villain isn't always you. It is not you as individual. It is not even you as member of society. It is not your society itself. Not everything revolves around you. Neither is the Hero always you; that's just a goal to strive for. Why? It is because, while your mythology may be what Jung calls a "projection" of collective psychic forces, it remains a symbol with a meaning in **the World.**

All peoples have mythologies they turn to in a crisis. Not all peoples are oppressors in all crises, yet the myths they turn to still hold true. That such a myth is a "projection" does not mean that it's a *Shadow*. Villains do exist within the World; that's why a work of older fiction uses "villain" to describe its characters. It's not just shouting subtext which the modern audience is too "advanced" to need explained. It's rather stating facts which modern audiences are too decadent to recognize *as* facts: that there are Good and Evil in this World. Society is not a mere device instilling you, the individual, with prejudice towards the Other. Mythology is not to be explained away by clinical psychology; it's to be reaffirmed, since, in the words of Jung, to live without a myth is madness, and an integrated life is not without its share of conflict.

**[({R.G.)}]**

Click for the Original Assertion.

An Addendum: Why I Do Not Watch *Attack on Titan*.

**This Page has been Optimized for Discord.**

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

First Response to Hazmat: Absolutist Ethics.

Image
Yes: I value the opinions of others, insofar as I can vouch for their integrity. Yet that requires that they fervently believe that what they say is true, that they can stand beside it, put it into practice, and uphold it as a sacred principle, as though it were a Higher Power which compelled them. It thus follows that, so long as an opinion is valid, one must validate it not by merely practicing that view within one’s own life, but by holding others to it. One cannot impose morality on anyone, because morality is binding on us all, in equal measure, and one’s only burden is to fathom it, to the extent one can, and to uphold it. That is not an imposition; it’s an obligation, and, without it, we have nothing. You once asked me: “At what point is it an evil to impose one’s views of righteousness on someone else?” I’ll answer with the obvious: at no point, whatsoever, since it is impossible. Where Righteousness is what’s at stake, one can’t “impose on someone else”, as though one posed a
Read more

Justice for R. Kelly: a Reflection on the State of Eros. (Dedicated to the Lady Jerri.)

  I've been reading, recently, about the life of Robert Kelly, whom you'd recognize from *Space Jam*'s soundtrack, the "Ignition" remix, and his many other hits, such as "Trapped in the Closet". It just breaks my heart to see how he was treated, not just as a child who had to grow up much too fast, but also as an adult, even after having given us such heartfelt, soulful music. I could never reconcile those sweet and sentimental, loving, sometimes mystifying tones with the entire image of a sex offender; he was a Don Juan, but not Don Giovanni.   Clearly, that same mainstream media that made him famous had betrayed him, while the legal system, which was never there for him when he himself most needed and deserved it, in the tenderness of youth, went well beyond its obligations in defence of "children". The hypocrisy is not the part which angers me, as it is so ironic that it's laughable, and that alleviates some of the sadness of this gr
Read more

The Early Death of Any Future Peace:

  The biggest problem with the issue of abortion seems, at first, to be that no one wants to talk about it *as* a controversial issue. All the major arguments which either “side” reiterates have been around for roughly half a century at least, and we have made no progress in resolving them in the last forty years. This does not stop idealogues from acting like the matter’s settled and that *their* side won, however.   Yet beyond the moderate, “politically correct” and “civil” surface of the issue lies the deeper issue: Hardly anybody wants to talk about abortion *in itself*, and those who advocate for “choice” (and, by extension, for abortion, as it has to be a choice) are those least willing to discuss *the act itself* and whether it is good or evil to commit.   Instead, we hear from advocates for “choice” a slew of beautiful ideals, impassioned speeches, and redundant platitudes: -    the value of one’s bodily autonomy, -    the need for women to receive protection in a m
Read more